Brookefield Property Partners (BPY) derives roughly 60% of its FFO
from retail locations. Given the current retail environment, this area should
be a cause for concern for investors. In its latest earnings call, BPY stated that
their retail properties saw 5.3% same property revenue growth and a 20%
increase in new lease prices when compared to expiring leases. The numbers
sound promising, but could potentially be misleading.
The 20% increase in new lease price is compared to expiring
leases, but ‘expiring leases’ does not paint a very clear picture. It is
possible that the leases expiring were long term leases with outdated
conditions for lease adjustment, making the lessee’s payment well below market value.
If the lease payments are increasing 20% from well below market value, it does
not represent the explosive growth in retail that the measure would first lead
you to believe, granted it is still positive for BPY, but not nearly to the same extent. While this scenario is unlikely, it is entirely possible for a struggling company to use this to keep investors optimistic.
The purpose of this demonstration is to say that metrics
with extremely nebulous comparisons do not provide as clear a picture as one
might hope. Statistics are often viewed as infallible, however they can be
manipulated to paint a rosier picture. The key is to look for clear metrics in
which it is easily understood where the numbers are drawn from. An example would be when management cited a 1%
growth rate in retail tenant sales year over year. This growth rate
demonstrates a much clearer image of the health of their retail segment. The
growth in retail sales is simply not there, which could mean that demand for property could soon follow the slowing growth trend.
As you can see, these different metrics convey two
completely different narratives regarding the health of their retail division.
It is crucial to understand the whole story, rather than fit a convenient stat
to a rationale.
Comments
Post a Comment