When a person walks into Walmart and they are looking to buy
a backpack, they will go to the shelves and peruse the various backpacks
looking for a familiar name. Walmart’s generic backpack may be featured among
them, perhaps having a favorable position to the isle, but generally the name
brands that sell there do not want to be overpowered. Amazon does not have this
problem.
Through the nature of their website, Amazon knows
immediately what you are looking for when you type it in and therefore can immediately push their product as your first choice. Their brand is front and
center and often the lowest price. There is no need to browse the various
offerings because Amazon has what you need right there, and so you buy. Another advantage they
have is the ability to promptly collect data on which products are selling the
best. Once a product is identified, they can quickly launch their generic
version and push out the seller.
There is essentially no limit to the vastness of their
product offerings. If they can identify a target product, they can get the sale.
Depending on how aggressively they push Basics, it could serve to consolidate
their seller base, and generate more top-line growth going forward. I doubt that Amazon Basics
generates a higher margin than a pure commission sale, but it certainly generates a
far greater amount of revenue per item.
In the end the effect is that Amazon Basics covers high
volume, relatively low cost items. Previously, Amazon would make a small amount
when each item was sold by an independent seller. Amazon Basics allows them to
recognize the full item value as revenue, potentially boosting top line
growth to appease investors while sacrificing gross margin. In the long run,
the tactics may prove more profitable, but currently they could give a false sense of
growth.
Comments
Post a Comment